Poser: can there be an operative cross-connection between ferrite magnet anomalies and LENR thermal anomalies involving protons and the DDL ? The two seem completely unrelated at first.
First, consider magnet composition, but dispense with prior assumptions that
there is no embedded hydrogen in ferrites - since there are various ways to
manufacture them. One way, which is preferred for hard magnets (using
strontium or barium, or a mix of the two) and which will introduce hydrogen
into the magnet composition even after firing at high temperature - is
called the wet process. A water slurry of powdered ferrite material is
pressed and then calcined. Most, but not all of the hydrogen from the water
content is driven off.
Even so, the final hydrogen content of wet processed ferrite magnets can be
as high as 1-2 % (atomic ratio). There is a patent for a process using
ammonia wetting, allowing 10% hydrogen in ferrites (atomic). Even without
ammonia, a one pound billet made from the wet process could contain a gram
of protons... and consequently, up to a gram of HDDL if optimally processed
and conditioned. An atom of HDDL (hydrogen deep Dirac level), at least on
paper, has a rather enormous magnetic field strength. The HDDL is also
highly mobile, unlike the iron oxides - which is important in the context of
superparamagnetism and superferromagnetism. There can be a rapid
self-oscillation between antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic alignments due
to the mobility of the species.
Therefore, the connection of "dark matter" to LENR and also to magnetic
anomalies - can be tentatively defined as a DDL hydrogen connection (with an
IP of ~3.7 keV and an orbital near 100 fm) - and this can serve to explain
thermo-magnetic anomalies in two disparate systems.
But the big surprise is that the thermal anomalies can be exothermic or
endothermic (or absent) depending on circumstances. Endothermic anomalies
are more interesting in a way since they are easier to document reliably.
Thermal endotherm could be related to motional field-lines and thereby to
direct conversion of that motion into electricity - and thermal endotherm
has been documented. This does not violate CoE since thermal loss is
balanced by electrical gain.
Jones
From: David Roberson
The inverse cube law is normally seen when a
two pole magnet is observed at a dimension that is relatively large compared
to the spacing between those poles. If you monitor the field variation when
close to one of the poles you get the second order behavior.
The actual internal structure of the
magnetic field generation is not known so it is highly speculative to assume
that the external magnetic field originates from one tiny region within the
reactor. I personally think that the field is the net vector sum of a very
large number of tiny sources and hence may not become as large as is
suggested as we close in on those individual sources.
The time rate of change of the field becomes
important as one attempts to understand the penetration of that field
through the structure. A rapidly changing field is attenuated strongly by
conductive material while a steady field has a free pass.
It is OK to speculate wildly on vortex since
that is one of the guiding principles, but we must always realize that most
of these ideas will turn out to be false once the true nature of the beast
is revealed.
Dave
Good post. Something similar wrt a non-stationary magnetic
field happens with another anomalous device - which is called the
Manelas/Sweet device, mentioned here before. There may be a non-obvious
connection to LENR. A visual image of levitation of a hat pin, above the
magnet of this device, is seen in slide-6, here:
http://e-catsite.com/manelas-device/
I have one of these conditioned billets. The field strength
on the surface is not high, typical for a ferrite and it alternates in
polarity across the surface, and is fluid - in the sense of self-moving in
certain areas where the poles change. There is a focal point of highest
field strength purposely located above the center region, which is
significantly away (removed) from the surface.
This magnet was the impetus which has pushed Ahern towards a
theory of "nanomagnetism" which is seen in both LENR and in exotic
electronic devices.
BTW, in operation the Manelas magnet drops in temperature by
several degrees below ambient, even though it is operating as the core of
50-watt transformer!
Go figure.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
