It seems there are polarized opinions on the meaning of 'polarized opinions'. >From the standpoint of an optimist it could mean the polarized opinions of the outside world, but from the standpoint of a pessimist it could mean the polarized opinions of the testers. Someone could ask Frank Acland to clarify the meaning.
Harry On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dave, you and I picked up on the most important phrase that others seems > to have missed - "Polarized Opinions". This by itself has got to refer to > opinions of the testers, not the outside world. For why would the > polarized opinions of the outside world suddenly make a difference in the > release of the TIP2 report? The outside world opinion has always been > polarized since the beginning, why make a difference now? especially in the > context of the TIP2 release date? > > > Jojo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:28 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers > > Jojo, I hope you are wrong about your conclusion. It does concern me by > the expression of "Polarized opinions". Best case is for them to be > referring to how the device operates instead of how well it works. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wed, Aug 20, 2014 11:29 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers > > Sure, you can be optimistic and read it that way; but it seems clear in the > context of the statements, that the "Polarized opinions" is the reason. > Reason for what? reason for not giving pre-statements about a timing or > content of the report. Why would any polarized outside opinion be the > reason for any delay in the timing of the release? or affect the content of > the report? > > It seems clear. The testers can not agree on what to write. This can only > mean some think it is positive, some think it is negative. They can't agree > like a hang jury. > > > > Jojo > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Fletcher" <a...@well.com> > To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:20 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers > > > > From: "Jojo Iznart" <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:07:08 AM > > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/ > > As reported in e-catworld. It seems the TIP2 testers are having a lot of > > disagreements; hence the delay in the release of the report. This does not > > bode well for the ECat. I have been one of a few that think too many > > warning flags have been seen lately regarding the ECat. Chances of it > > being a Scam has increased. > > > > I don't read it that way --- > > > > "The response I received was that they realize there is a great amount of > > interest in the report, but that because of polarized opinions surrounding > > the LENR and E-Cat, it was not advisable to give any pre-statements about > > the content of timing or the report." > > > > The "polarized opinions" are those in the outside world, not within the > > team - which wants to get it right. And, quite correctly, say "nothing to > > nobody" until the report's out. > > > > >
