Sorry, I just found this thread -- I didn't realize there was such controversy going on.
The term 'polarized opinions' was in reference to people on the outside -- not among the testers. Frank On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:26 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems there are polarized opinions on the meaning of 'polarized > opinions'. > From the standpoint of an optimist it could mean the polarized opinions of > the outside world, but from the standpoint of a pessimist it could mean the > polarized opinions of the testers. Someone could ask Frank Acland to > clarify the meaning. > > Harry > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dave, you and I picked up on the most important phrase that others >> seems to have missed - "Polarized Opinions". This by itself has got to >> refer to opinions of the testers, not the outside world. For why would the >> polarized opinions of the outside world suddenly make a difference in the >> release of the TIP2 report? The outside world opinion has always been >> polarized since the beginning, why make a difference now? especially in the >> context of the TIP2 release date? >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* David Roberson <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:28 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers >> >> Jojo, I hope you are wrong about your conclusion. It does concern me by >> the expression of "Polarized opinions". Best case is for them to be >> referring to how the device operates instead of how well it works. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wed, Aug 20, 2014 11:29 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers >> >> Sure, you can be optimistic and read it that way; but it seems clear in the >> context of the statements, that the "Polarized opinions" is the reason. >> Reason for what? reason for not giving pre-statements about a timing or >> content of the report. Why would any polarized outside opinion be the >> reason for any delay in the timing of the release? or affect the content of >> the report? >> >> It seems clear. The testers can not agree on what to write. This can only >> mean some think it is positive, some think it is negative. They can't agree >> like a hang jury. >> >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alan Fletcher" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:20 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polarized ECat Testers >> >> >> > From: "Jojo Iznart" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:07:08 AM >> > http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/20/e-cat-report-watch-thread/ >> > As reported in e-catworld. It seems the TIP2 testers are having a lot of >> > disagreements; hence the delay in the release of the report. This does not >> > bode well for the ECat. I have been one of a few that think too many >> > warning flags have been seen lately regarding the ECat. Chances of it >> > being a Scam has increased. >> > >> > I don't read it that way --- >> > >> > "The response I received was that they realize there is a great amount of >> > interest in the report, but that because of polarized opinions surrounding >> > the LENR and E-Cat, it was not advisable to give any pre-statements about >> > the content of timing or the report." >> > >> > The "polarized opinions" are those in the outside world, not within the >> > team - which wants to get it right. And, quite correctly, say "nothing to >> > nobody" until the report's out. >> > >> >> >> > -- Frank Acland Publisher, E-Cat World <http://www.e-catworld.com>
