To me, all of the expertise, all of the Ph.D's, all of the tenure and all of 
the opinions of climatologists are simply worthless in relation to the world at 
large - except for their ability to make accurate predictions.

Really, of what general value would climatology be without an established 
record of prediction?  It would come painfully close to being a pseudo-science.

This doesn't mean that they need to be able to forecast tomorrow's lottery 
numbers ( in effect) but we should expect that they can create predictive 
graphs that follow emerging reality with a reasonable fit - and frankly, that's 
where the problem seems to be.

Reply via email to