If all the electrons and photons are joined in a boson condensate that have come to a common energy state, a photon blockade is established for new EMF.
as an analogy... EMF behaves like a drop of hot water that is dropped into a large glass of ice water. The hot water mixes and thereby shares it energy to the cold ensemble of more massive numbers of colder water molecules. On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > the gamma is only required if > - the reaction is not zeromomentum (you see why I support that geometry is > the kety adn reaction have to be geometrically symmetric) > - or energy cannot be transmited as another potential energy to an object > that have enoug energy state to dissipate it in smaller quanta X-rays or > below... > > there is no other choise, since we don't see any gamma in LENR > , > it happens... > > 1- no free neutrons, so aneutronic... > 2- no gamma, so geometrically symmetric reaction, with a big object > strongly bound to absorb MeV, and multi-body to dissipate it as many quanta > > I know this idea is shocking some, but if we talk of "LAWS" of physics, we > shoul start by the most strong laws, and the one which apply to object that > don't suffer from the lattice context. > > the miracle is not specific to Rossi and Ni62... > it happens also with iwamura, to F&P, to Miley... > > > > 2014-10-14 1:17 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene <[email protected]>: > >> McKubre is a very careful in his wording. He has to be in his position >> – almost a diplomat. >> >> >> >> When he says: “If one were to reshuffle the neutrons of the five stable >> Ni isotopes in the directions of the revealed changes, we would have a >> great deal of energy—possibly far too much”... >> >> >> >> Yup. That is the understatement of the year… it is like 100 times too >> much energy depending on how representative the sample was – yet with gamma >> radiation near background, if not below. This is a physical impossibility. >> >> >> >> That speaks volumes to those who categorically reject the idea that there >> is “no motivation for deceit.” The sample was compromised. >> >> >> >> Jones >> >> >> > >
