rewriting...

If all the electrons and photons are joined in a boson condensate that have
come to a common energy state, a photon blockade is established for new EMF.

as an analogy...

Here, energetic EMF like gamma rays  behaves like a drop of hot water that
is dropped into a large glass of ice water.  The hot water mixes  and
thereby shares it energy with the more massive ensemble  of colder water
molecules.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> If all the electrons and photons are joined in a boson condensate that
> have come to a common energy state, a photon blockade is established for
> new EMF.
>
> as an analogy...
>
> EMF behaves like a drop of hot water that is dropped into a large glass of
> ice water.  The hot water mixes and thereby shares it energy to the cold
> ensemble of more massive numbers of colder water molecules.
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> the gamma is only required if
>> - the reaction is not zeromomentum (you see why I support that geometry
>> is the kety adn reaction have to be geometrically symmetric)
>> - or energy cannot be transmited as another potential energy to an object
>> that have enoug energy state to dissipate it in smaller quanta X-rays or
>> below...
>>
>> there is no other choise, since we don't see any gamma in LENR
>> ,
>> it happens...
>>
>> 1- no free neutrons,  so aneutronic...
>> 2- no gamma, so geometrically symmetric reaction, with a big object
>> strongly bound to absorb MeV, and multi-body to dissipate it as many quanta
>>
>> I know this idea is shocking some, but if we talk of "LAWS" of physics,
>> we shoul start by the most strong laws, and the one which apply to object
>> that don't suffer from the lattice context.
>>
>> the miracle is not specific to Rossi and Ni62...
>> it happens also with iwamura, to F&P, to Miley...
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-10-14 1:17 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>   McKubre is a very careful in his wording. He has to be in his
>>> position – almost a diplomat.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> When he says: “If one were to reshuffle the neutrons of the five stable
>>> Ni isotopes in the directions of the revealed changes, we would have a
>>> great deal of energy—possibly far too much”...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yup. That is the understatement of the year… it is like 100 times too
>>> much energy depending on how representative the sample was – yet with gamma
>>> radiation near background, if not below. This is a physical impossibility.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That speaks volumes to those who categorically reject the idea that
>>> there is “no motivation for deceit.” The sample was compromised.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jones
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to