Dear Jed, See please the 1 =0 Rule- http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/05/the-1-0-rule-generalized.html
I have learned it from the failures in actual tecghnological research. Just now it seems an error that all the nickel eggs were put in a single alumina basket. I think that performing three consecutive & parallel experiments in different conditions - according to some logic and plan would have been increased the performance three times, at only 10% increased effort, 60% increased expenses and 10 times more muzzles put to the Rossi killers. Peter On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > See: > > http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue118/analysis.html > > > Jed's opinion: > > I completely agree with everything McKubre says here about the > calorimetry. I share his reservations. I agree with the rest of this report > except the nuclear theory is partly over my head. No opinion about that. > > I like this statement: > > "One experimental result equates to zero experimental results. Nothing in > science can be known without repetition." > > > Very true and people often forget it. Or, as I have been saying, > definitive experiments only happen in Hollywood movies. > > McKubre emphasizes the need for more communication from the authors. Yes! > That would be a big help. I hope the authors respond to the questions here: > > > http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/722-Ask-questions-to-the-Working-Group-ECAT-long-term-test/ > > Especially I hope they respond to *my* questions. I will be nervous about > this experiment until they say the cell was incandescent white. That is the > simplest way to confirm that the temperature really was around 1300°C. The > photograph in Fig. 12 shows it around 700°C, judging by the dull red color. > See: > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incandescence#mediaviewer/File:Incandescence_Color.jpg > > I do not know when they took that photo. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
