I like it. SPPs only live for a few picoseconds. They are half light and half electron. SPPs need to be vigorously pumped. If fusion feeds SPP creation we should see an increase in electrons as well as heat. As Rossi reported, he sees a large production of electrostatic charge in his reactor, Electrons are being created by SPP formation from the transformation of fusion energy into electrons,
When a Hot-Cat melts down or runs in self sustained mode, the pumping of SPPs come entirely from fusion. No external power is required. I would drain of those excess electrons off as a source of current as done in the Papp engine. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Another remote possibility should be mentioned, if real gain is found in > this device… and that would be this: the basis of gain could be only SPP – > surface plasmon polaritons. This species may be gainful in itself as it > condenses. Electrons would be lost to the Dirac sea via SPP, for instance - > but with a relic such as spin retained in 3-space. > > > > Again that may seem remote to you now, but to someone who has studied SPP > it is more probable than magic gamma ray absorbers, the infamous gram of > magic fuel for 30 days, magic internal cooling to protect the fuel, magic > fuel rejuvenation of surface features, and the dozen or so other miracles > necessary for this device to be related to nuclear fusion. > > > > What are the main objections to a SPP modality? > > > > Jones > > > > *From:* Bob Higgins > > > > … Think about it like a microwave oven (only x-rays instead of > microwaves). The oven walls don't initially get hot. The food inside gets > hot from the microwave absorbtion and the IR from the food then heats up > the walls of the oven. > > >
