No radioactive isotopes production is another LENR miracle. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW – the beauty of an SPP hypothesis is that - not only is it falsifiable, > but the proof or disproof will happen in about 6 days if everything goes > well. > > If the MFMP puts together a “dummy” reactor - and it is even slightly > gainful, then of course the mystery will be solved. > > From: Axil > > Fusion must be involved because there is all kinds of > transmutations taking place. If the energy came from the vacuum, then no > ash > would be generated and the reactor will not need a fuel recharge to > function. > > A better explanation for the transmutation is that isotopes have been > salted > into the sample which were there at the start. If there was real > transmutation there would be radioactive daughters in the ash. There were > none. > From: Axil > I like it. > SPPs only live for a few picoseconds. They > are half light and half electron. SPPs need to be vigorously pumped. If > fusion feeds SPP creation we should see an increase in electrons as well as > heat. > Since this reactor depends on continuous electrical input > to > sustain an incandescent filament, the current alone should be able to > vigorously pump SPP and increase electron charge. The reactor may float at > substantial charge above ground. > As Rossi reported, he sees a large > production of electrostatic charge in his reactor, Electrons are being > created by SPP formation from the transformation of fusion energy into > electrons > Fusion energy may not be necessary. Does the Levi team > mention electrostatic charge? > When a Hot-Cat melts down or runs in self > sustained mode, the pumping of SPPs come entirely from fusion. No external > power is required. > That was the previous design and is not the case here, > since > the reaction stops when the power stops. This may be a different kind of > Hot-Cat than the one previously seen with the steel casing. A steel reactor > would be grounded, reducing charge accumulation. > Another remote possibility should be > mentioned, if real gain is found in this device… and that would be this: > the basis of gain could be only SPP – surface plasmon polaritons. This > species may be gainful in itself as it condenses. Electrons would be lost > to > the Dirac sea via SPP, for instance - but with a relic such as spin > retained > in 3-space. > Jones > > >
