BTW – the beauty of an SPP hypothesis is that - not only is it falsifiable, but the proof or disproof will happen in about 6 days if everything goes well.
If the MFMP puts together a “dummy” reactor - and it is even slightly
gainful, then of course the mystery will be solved.
From: Axil
Fusion must be involved because there is all kinds of
transmutations taking place. If the energy came from the vacuum, then no ash
would be generated and the reactor will not need a fuel recharge to
function.
A better explanation for the transmutation is that isotopes have been salted
into the sample which were there at the start. If there was real
transmutation there would be radioactive daughters in the ash. There were
none.
From: Axil
I like it.
SPPs only live for a few picoseconds. They
are half light and half electron. SPPs need to be vigorously pumped. If
fusion feeds SPP creation we should see an increase in electrons as well as
heat.
Since this reactor depends on continuous electrical input to
sustain an incandescent filament, the current alone should be able to
vigorously pump SPP and increase electron charge. The reactor may float at
substantial charge above ground.
As Rossi reported, he sees a large
production of electrostatic charge in his reactor, Electrons are being
created by SPP formation from the transformation of fusion energy into
electrons
Fusion energy may not be necessary. Does the Levi team
mention electrostatic charge?
When a Hot-Cat melts down or runs in self
sustained mode, the pumping of SPPs come entirely from fusion. No external
power is required.
That was the previous design and is not the case here, since
the reaction stops when the power stops. This may be a different kind of
Hot-Cat than the one previously seen with the steel casing. A steel reactor
would be grounded, reducing charge accumulation.
Another remote possibility should be
mentioned, if real gain is found in this device… and that would be this:
the basis of gain could be only SPP – surface plasmon polaritons. This
species may be gainful in itself as it condenses. Electrons would be lost to
the Dirac sea via SPP, for instance - but with a relic such as spin retained
in 3-space.
Jones
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
