When a reaction occurs, Do the lattice atoms on the end of the BEC chain participate?
It's fascinating to speculate on this. ***Here's a speculation. Inside of a BEC, fusion takes place. And due to the nature of a BEC, the nuclear reactive products (gammas) are dispersed quite evenly. But some of those products are still so energetic that they generate very direct rays into the metal matrix in such a way that they transmute the products of the host metal, all the way down to Nickel62 in Rossi's case. Why are those nuclear reactive products so directed? Because they were LINEAR BECs, with only one direction of energy outflow: at either end of the line BEC. Also, interesting interactions take place between linear BECS and the rest of the bulk mass--collisions, spin transfers, BEC growth, and chemical pushback. All of which generate heat but no gammas to speak of. On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:16 PM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the reference Kevin. I see you and Axil really got into this > idea. I read your-all's whole thread exchange and it's inspiring. What I > also should add is that Storm is inspiring as well. I really asked him > several times what he meant by NAE (the Nuclear Active Environment) and it > was never clear to me what he meant until I saw a youtube video of him > describing it at one of the CF conferences. If I understand the jist of > that, he is claiming that at dislocations, certain metal crystals, D or H > atoms will fill the dislocation. At the dislocations, there is enough > electron screening that the particles in dislocation can interact strongly. > > > Just to pitch it out there, Y.E. Kim and his students have already worked > through his N-Body BECs (N<100) and found some interesting outcomes. The > reason BECs are so important is that is when the PSI of the wave function > geometrically extended and |PSI^2| is the probability of finding a particle > at a particular position. When a superposition of PSI's occurs > (overlapping waves), the overlap describes a probability that interaction > can occur. That interaction will probably be electromagnetic, but it can > also be by strong interactions if E/M is screened. In a BEC every particle > overlaps with every-other particle, and geometrically the PSI's can be > huge; mm in size. The overlaps can be very large and the probabilities for > interaction by strong force component of the wave function can be large > too. In my mind, if you have a BEC of D ions, you will have fusion. The > same concept could even apply to the core of the sun. > > NAE's are Nuclear Active Environments, or lattice dislocation > (environments), that are Nuclear active. It's a location that is conducive > to an N-body nuclear interaction between fusing objects. Dr. Storm > suggests lattice dislocations along some crystal direction like a 010 or a > 001 ... could form the environment for an N-body interaction. While Kim > has theory of N-body, he doesn't have any theory on a geometrically > constrained BEC. Say an N-body reaction on the 011 lattice defect for > example. When a reaction occurs, Do the lattice atoms on the end of the > BEC chain participate? > > It's fascinating to speculate on this. > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> started thinking about new concept of 1D strings of Boson >> ***Sounds like my V1DLLBEC theory. >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg95060.html >> et al >> >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the report Axil. That is an impressive shift and certainly >>> not coincidental. Gas is $2.90 at the pump. Is this just a reaction to >>> the idea of cheap fusion energy? >>> >>> I'm still reading Vortex-L although I don't have as much time to >>> participate as I would like. I haven't abandoned the BEC ideas, and >>> always read yours with enthusiasm. I've been thinking a lot about Storm's >>> ideas on the NEA stuff, and started thinking about new concept of 1D >>> strings of Boson, and other 1D string quantum chains and trying to derive >>> interaction probabilities. I need more time to dedicate to the math, but >>> using Y. E. Kim and crew as a starting point, and the replacing X, with >>> X[chain], I'm hoping to see a Phi for S=0 on the X[chain]. Has anyone >>> looked at Storm's predictions about Rossi's experiment? >>> >>> Have Fun, >>> Chuck >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/?p=394 >>>> >>>> The Big Banks are Certainly Paying Attention to the E-Cat >>>> >>>> While looking in the logs after publishing the E-Cat report I found out >>>> that within minutes it was downloaded by an IP number owned by Blackrock. >>>> Within minutes after that oil futures started to fall and have stayed >>>> volatile since… >>>> >>>> [image: lugano] >>>> <http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/lugano.png> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
