Axil, Chuck, etal--
I would add that the presence of a magnetic field reduces the locations the
PSI allows and increases the probability that any two particles will occupy the
same location. IMO this is a basis for controlling the rate of reactions in
NAE. I also consider it is improper not to consider the effects of spin
coupling and spin mass changes in such systems. I do not know how Kim etal
handle this issue nor the effect of magnetic resonances associated with their
BEC's in a NAE.
I consider the same situation can occur with fewer particles in a face centered
cubic lattice of Pd or Ni or any other such crystalline cell when packed with D
or H. This may be more likely near a surface or under high Zeta electric
potentials in an electro-chemical cell. The presence of Li near a surface and
inside the lattice fcc cell may also occasion nuclear reactions in combination
with H or D or both. A small number of Cooper Pairs of H (Bose particles) may
act like Kim's BEC in a NAE.
Again, keep in mind that the local magnetic field modifies the PSI, including
energy states associated with spin energy, and causes degeneration of the
allowable energy states and the allowable positions for particles it
"controls". In a packed space the fewer the positions available the more
likely any allowable position is occupied. Therefore, particle interactions
become more likely.
Most simple treatments of the PSI's do not include the consideration of energy
states associated with a system in a magnetic field (B field) within a solid
state. A quick review of the Wikipedia discussion of PSI wave functions seems
to neglect the issue of an ambient magnetic field and its influence on the
energy states of the Hamiltonian describing kinetic and potential energy of the
system and as further described by the PSI.
(It has always been my opinion that spin energy and angular momentum must
impact the overall PSI of a QM coherent system and the transitions that allow
mass energy to change to radiation and escape the system or heat in the form
of kinetic energy of the lattice.)
Bob Cook
----- Original Message -----
From: CB Sites
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Big Banks are Certainly Paying Attention to the E-Cat
Thanks for the reference Kevin. I see you and Axil really got into this
idea. I read your-all's whole thread exchange and it's inspiring. What I
also should add is that Storm is inspiring as well. I really asked him several
times what he meant by NAE (the Nuclear Active Environment) and it was never
clear to me what he meant until I saw a youtube video of him describing it at
one of the CF conferences. If I understand the jist of that, he is claiming
that at dislocations, certain metal crystals, D or H atoms will fill the
dislocation. At the dislocations, there is enough electron screening that the
particles in dislocation can interact strongly.
Just to pitch it out there, Y.E. Kim and his students have already worked
through his N-Body BECs (N<100) and found some interesting outcomes. The
reason BECs are so important is that is when the PSI of the wave function
geometrically extended and |PSI^2| is the probability of finding a particle at
a particular position. When a superposition of PSI's occurs (overlapping
waves), the overlap describes a probability that interaction can occur. That
interaction will probably be electromagnetic, but it can also be by strong
interactions if E/M is screened. In a BEC every particle overlaps with
every-other particle, and geometrically the PSI's can be huge; mm in size. The
overlaps can be very large and the probabilities for interaction by strong
force component of the wave function can be large too. In my mind, if you have
a BEC of D ions, you will have fusion. The same concept could even apply to
the core of the sun.
NAE's are Nuclear Active Environments, or lattice dislocation (environments),
that are Nuclear active. It's a location that is conducive to an N-body
nuclear interaction between fusing objects. Dr. Storm suggests lattice
dislocations along some crystal direction like a 010 or a 001 ... could form
the environment for an N-body interaction. While Kim has theory of N-body, he
doesn't have any theory on a geometrically constrained BEC. Say an N-body
reaction on the 011 lattice defect for example. When a reaction occurs, Do
the lattice atoms on the end of the BEC chain participate?
It's fascinating to speculate on this.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote:
started thinking about new concept of 1D strings of Boson
***Sounds like my V1DLLBEC theory.
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg95060.html
et al
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks for the report Axil. That is an impressive shift and certainly
not coincidental. Gas is $2.90 at the pump. Is this just a reaction to the
idea of cheap fusion energy?
I'm still reading Vortex-L although I don't have as much time to
participate as I would like. I haven't abandoned the BEC ideas, and always
read yours with enthusiasm. I've been thinking a lot about Storm's ideas on
the NEA stuff, and started thinking about new concept of 1D strings of Boson,
and other 1D string quantum chains and trying to derive interaction
probabilities. I need more time to dedicate to the math, but using Y. E. Kim
and crew as a starting point, and the replacing X, with X[chain], I'm hoping to
see a Phi for S=0 on the X[chain]. Has anyone looked at Storm's predictions
about Rossi's experiment?
Have Fun,
Chuck
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/?p=394
The Big Banks are Certainly Paying Attention to the E-Cat
While looking in the logs after publishing the E-Cat report I found out
that within minutes it was downloaded by an IP number owned by Blackrock.
Within minutes after that oil futures started to fall and have stayed volatile
since…
