That is an interesting point that I've not thought about, but Nickel does express a degree of magnetic susceptibility that is unlike other metals. So right there, Ni's spin influence is part of the mix. In a lattice dislocation (like the NAE Dr. Storms argues for), the spin of the Ni atoms in the NAE could be of huge consequence. Suppose the effect is dependent on the NAE concept, and a lattice defect that is conducive to spin aligning an N body string of hydrogen. It's an interesting problem.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, Chuck, etal-- > > I would add that the presence of a magnetic field reduces the locations > the PSI allows and increases the probability that any two particles will > occupy the same location. IMO this is a basis for controlling the rate of > reactions in NAE. I also consider it is improper not to consider the > effects of spin coupling and spin mass changes in such systems. I do not > know how Kim etal handle this issue nor the effect of magnetic resonances > associated with their BEC's in a NAE. > > I consider the same situation can occur with fewer particles in a face > centered cubic lattice of Pd or Ni or any other such crystalline cell when > packed with D or H. This may be more likely near a surface or under high > Zeta electric potentials in an electro-chemical cell. The presence of Li > near a surface and inside the lattice fcc cell may also occasion nuclear > reactions in combination with H or D or both. A small number of Cooper > Pairs of H (Bose particles) may act like Kim's BEC in a NAE. > > Again, keep in mind that the local magnetic field modifies the PSI, *including > energy states associated with spin energy*, and causes degeneration of > the allowable energy states and the allowable positions for particles it > "controls". In a packed space the fewer the positions available the more > likely any allowable position is occupied. Therefore, particle > interactions become more likely. > > Most simple treatments of the PSI's do not include the consideration of > energy states associated with a system in a magnetic field (B field) within > a solid state. A quick review of the Wikipedia discussion of PSI wave > functions seems to neglect the issue of an ambient magnetic field and its > influence on the energy states of the Hamiltonian describing kinetic and > potential energy of the system and as further described by the PSI. > > (It has always been my opinion that spin energy and angular momentum must > impact the overall PSI of a QM coherent system and the transitions that > allow mass energy to change to radiation and escape the system or heat in > the form of kinetic energy of the lattice.) > > Bob Cook > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* CB Sites <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, October 19, 2014 9:16 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The Big Banks are Certainly Paying Attention to the > E-Cat > > Thanks for the reference Kevin. I see you and Axil really got into this > idea. I read your-all's whole thread exchange and it's inspiring. What I > also should add is that Storm is inspiring as well. I really asked him > several times what he meant by NAE (the Nuclear Active Environment) and it > was never clear to me what he meant until I saw a youtube video of him > describing it at one of the CF conferences. If I understand the jist of > that, he is claiming that at dislocations, certain metal crystals, D or H > atoms will fill the dislocation. At the dislocations, there is enough > electron screening that the particles in dislocation can interact strongly. > > > Just to pitch it out there, Y.E. Kim and his students have already worked > through his N-Body BECs (N<100) and found some interesting outcomes. The > reason BECs are so important is that is when the PSI of the wave function > geometrically extended and |PSI^2| is the probability of finding a particle > at a particular position. When a superposition of PSI's occurs > (overlapping waves), the overlap describes a probability that interaction > can occur. That interaction will probably be electromagnetic, but it can > also be by strong interactions if E/M is screened. In a BEC every particle > overlaps with every-other particle, and geometrically the PSI's can be > huge; mm in size. The overlaps can be very large and the probabilities for > interaction by strong force component of the wave function can be large > too. In my mind, if you have a BEC of D ions, you will have fusion. The > same concept could even apply to the core of the sun. > > NAE's are Nuclear Active Environments, or lattice dislocation > (environments), that are Nuclear active. It's a location that is conducive > to an N-body nuclear interaction between fusing objects. Dr. Storm > suggests lattice dislocations along some crystal direction like a 010 or a > 001 ... could form the environment for an N-body interaction. While Kim > has theory of N-body, he doesn't have any theory on a geometrically > constrained BEC. Say an N-body reaction on the 011 lattice defect for > example. When a reaction occurs, Do the lattice atoms on the end of the > BEC chain participate? > > It's fascinating to speculate on this. > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> started thinking about new concept of 1D strings of Boson >> ***Sounds like my V1DLLBEC theory. >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg95060.html >> et al >> >> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, CB Sites <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the report Axil. That is an impressive shift and certainly >>> not coincidental. Gas is $2.90 at the pump. Is this just a reaction to >>> the idea of cheap fusion energy? >>> >>> I'm still reading Vortex-L although I don't have as much time to >>> participate as I would like. I haven't abandoned the BEC ideas, and >>> always read yours with enthusiasm. I've been thinking a lot about Storm's >>> ideas on the NEA stuff, and started thinking about new concept of 1D >>> strings of Boson, and other 1D string quantum chains and trying to derive >>> interaction probabilities. I need more time to dedicate to the math, but >>> using Y. E. Kim and crew as a starting point, and the replacing X, with >>> X[chain], I'm hoping to see a Phi for S=0 on the X[chain]. Has anyone >>> looked at Storm's predictions about Rossi's experiment? >>> >>> Have Fun, >>> Chuck >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/?p=394 >>>> >>>> The Big Banks are Certainly Paying Attention to the E-Cat >>>> >>>> While looking in the logs after publishing the E-Cat report I found >>>> out that within minutes it was downloaded by an IP number owned by >>>> Blackrock. Within minutes after that oil futures started to fall and have >>>> stayed volatile since… >>>> >>>> [image: lugano] >>>> <http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/lugano.png> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
