There is a two. way full duplex energy transfer path between the SPP condensate and the nuclear reactions via a magnetic field. Specifically a anapole field.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I made a mistake in the 4th paragraph and have changed the wording to > "one quanta" rather than "more one". > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:15 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born? > > Axil, Robert, Jones etal.-- > > How does the mass energy of a nucleus transfer to the plasmons described > in this article? > > It must be the secret sauce of Rossi's reactor. > > The mechanism of transferring the energy to the dipoles of the > nanoplasmonic substance and, hence via super radiance to the lattice of the > metal, seems correct assuming the nanoplasmonic coherent system or entity > is pumped up in energy by something. > > The paper cited does not address the possible ways of exciting the > available plasmonic entity Eigen states. It does suggest that Eigen values > of spin 1 are preferred in the transfer of small quanta of energy to the > metal lattice and this suggests a mechanism for mass transfer to the > plasmonic entity. > > Potentially, a two way reaction takes place where an excited nucleus with > its angular momentum Eigen states transfers one quanta of angular > momentum to the plasmonic state. This would change the odds for the return > to a lower energy nuclear state of the original nucleus and > potentially favor a new set of nuclei which conserve the angular momentum > of the coherent system--nuclei and nanoplasmonic state with a transfer of > many additional quanta to the plasmonic entity one quanta at a time. > > The nanoplasmonic state then proceeds to transfer its excess angular > momentum energy back to the metal lattice (as suggested in the paper from > Jackson State and the French University contributors) with the excess mass > changed to small bits of radiant energy and hence to heat. > > Exciting the Eigen states of the original nucleus is nothing more than > what is done in NMR (MRI) machines and maybe Rossi's reactor. > > In keeping with humble conjectures, > > Bob Cook > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:55 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born? > > Please...yes, you are all on the right track,,,This is all standard > nanoplasmonic theory. What is not covered by you good fellows yet and the > area that I am still ahead on is how the SPP concentrate EMF and project it > to cause nuclear reactions with the help of particle formation from the > vacuum.. > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Bob, >> >> The Pustovit paper you found certainly supplies the formalism for what we >> are suggesting, and is almost too perfect. >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0422v3.pdf >> "Plasmon-mediated superradiance near metal nanostructures" >> >> I am taken aback by a Russian PhD at Jackson State - being the author, but >> it is what it is. Lots of top-level Russians have come to the US simply to >> get away from that madness. >> >> Of course, this interlocking set of hypotheses we are talking about - is >> still a house of cards, and to combine so many mechanisms into a model >> which >> was ostensibly supposed to be based on nuclear fusion but is now >> completely >> different - is going to ruffle a lot of feathers. >> >> But clearly there is no nuclear reaction involved in this experiment, and >> if >> there can be 1.5 megawatt of heat with counts that are actually less than >> background - I think we are on the right track to pursue any valid >> alternative, even if the thermal gain was half the claim; and this hybrid >> explanation is looking better and better as the papers mount up suggesting >> that the SPP, superradiance and MIMS details are themselves relevant. The >> Casimir leg of the table is a bit shakier, but maybe not since it is based >> on solid results for several major Universities. >> >> Hopefully the MFMP will see a further validation of this M.O. - if and >> when >> their "dummy" turns out to produce what could be slight gain. That would >> be >> my expectation. >> >> Thanks for your insight. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Ellefson >> Dear Vortex-L, >> >> Stimulated by Jones Beene's thoughts on a coherent lasing system based on >> a >> Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) from his postings earlier today, I hope to >> encourage further discussion along these lines of thought. >> >> In reference to the characteristic morphology of the nickel ash grain >> (particle 1, figure 2, page 43) that I described in this posting: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html >> >> I believe that the abundant 2-micron protrusions in the nickel ash >> represent >> dipole oscillators which have literally evolved from the initial nickel >> fuel >> grain clusters during the startup and then operation of reactor. These >> oscillators form a coupled, complex, highly non-linear system that could >> be >> described as a LENR-driven LASER analog, much like the SPASER systems that >> are emerging in laboratories right now in the nanoscale, except these >> structures are micron-scale. One interesting paper which provides a >> potential analog is: >> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0422v3.pdf ("Plasmon-mediated >> superradiance near metal nanostructures") >> >> It is my contention that the observed microstructures in the nickel ash >> grain are _directly homologous_ to the Eigen-modes of this coherent >> system. >> I believe that Ni-Li neutron exchange reactions are being stimulated by >> SPP >> and phonon interactions on the protruding structures, and are producing a >> form of polychromatic superradiance such as that observed during reactions >> involving Metastable Innershell Molecular States (MIMS, aka >> ballotechnics). >> I suspect the energy gain comes from the vacuum during the LENR reaction, >> which I currently picture as a high-velocity collision of Li-Ni-Li that >> produces a MIMS reaction which also (hand-waving here) exchanges neutrons >> between lithium and nickel. This emits only intense photon and phonon >> energy, some of which couples back into the system to drive further >> reactions, while the rest is thermalized in the reactor shell. >> >> If this is true, then only the EMF stimulation is needed to control the >> reactor via SPP pumping once a certain operating temperature threshold has >> been reached by external heating. Rossi could simplify his control by >> separating these two functions of heating and EMF stimulation, I suspect. >> This separation may be the primary function of the mouse/cat reactor >> configuration, where the mouse emits primarily photons as the cat's >> controlling input, once a minimum temperature is reached throughout the >> system. >> >> Using only EMF pumping to control the reaction would also greatly improve >> the COP, which may be part of the reason why the systems that Rossi >> demonstrates still have combined heating and RF control inputs. >> >> I suspect that if you were to construct a good approximation of the nickel >> ash grain morphology with natural nickel, combined it with lithium and >> large >> iron grains, and stimulated it with EMF while at a high enough >> temperature, >> that you would see this system become active and gainful. A >> high-resolution >> 3-d printer could do this, as could a plethora of extant micro-fabrication >> techniques. Then again, given that Rossi's systems evolve in-situ from >> powdered fuel, why bother with fabricating machines? The main purpose I >> can >> think of for a designed and manufactured fuel morphology would be to >> optimize the potential for electrical output while minimizing thermal >> output. >> >> I hope these ideas are able to inspire further insights into this system. >> >> -Bob Ellefson >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
