Axil--
I think I have seen this idea from you before. Is there any paper with
evidence of the reaction you suggest for an anapole field.
Why not just normal dipole or quadrupole reactions?
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born?
There is a two. way full duplex energy transfer path between the SPP
condensate and the nuclear reactions via a magnetic field. Specifically a
anapole field.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I made a mistake in the 4th paragraph and have changed the wording to "one
quanta" rather than "more one".
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Cook
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born?
Axil, Robert, Jones etal.--
How does the mass energy of a nucleus transfer to the plasmons described
in this article?
It must be the secret sauce of Rossi's reactor.
The mechanism of transferring the energy to the dipoles of the
nanoplasmonic substance and, hence via super radiance to the lattice of the
metal, seems correct assuming the nanoplasmonic coherent system or entity is
pumped up in energy by something.
The paper cited does not address the possible ways of exciting the
available plasmonic entity Eigen states. It does suggest that Eigen values of
spin 1 are preferred in the transfer of small quanta of energy to the metal
lattice and this suggests a mechanism for mass transfer to the plasmonic entity.
Potentially, a two way reaction takes place where an excited nucleus
with its angular momentum Eigen states transfers one quanta of angular
momentum to the plasmonic state. This would change the odds for the return to
a lower energy nuclear state of the original nucleus and potentially favor a
new set of nuclei which conserve the angular momentum of the coherent
system--nuclei and nanoplasmonic state with a transfer of many additional
quanta to the plasmonic entity one quanta at a time.
The nanoplasmonic state then proceeds to transfer its excess angular
momentum energy back to the metal lattice (as suggested in the paper from
Jackson State and the French University contributors) with the excess mass
changed to small bits of radiant energy and hence to heat.
Exciting the Eigen states of the original nucleus is nothing more than
what is done in NMR (MRI) machines and maybe Rossi's reactor.
In keeping with humble conjectures,
Bob Cook
----- Original Message -----
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born?
Please...yes, you are all on the right track,,,This is all standard
nanoplasmonic theory. What is not covered by you good fellows yet and the area
that I am still ahead on is how the SPP concentrate EMF and project it to cause
nuclear reactions with the help of particle formation from the vacuum..
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
wrote:
Bob,
The Pustovit paper you found certainly supplies the formalism for
what we
are suggesting, and is almost too perfect.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0422v3.pdf
"Plasmon-mediated superradiance near metal nanostructures"
I am taken aback by a Russian PhD at Jackson State - being the
author, but
it is what it is. Lots of top-level Russians have come to the US
simply to
get away from that madness.
Of course, this interlocking set of hypotheses we are talking about -
is
still a house of cards, and to combine so many mechanisms into a
model which
was ostensibly supposed to be based on nuclear fusion but is now
completely
different - is going to ruffle a lot of feathers.
But clearly there is no nuclear reaction involved in this experiment,
and if
there can be 1.5 megawatt of heat with counts that are actually less
than
background - I think we are on the right track to pursue any valid
alternative, even if the thermal gain was half the claim; and this
hybrid
explanation is looking better and better as the papers mount up
suggesting
that the SPP, superradiance and MIMS details are themselves relevant.
The
Casimir leg of the table is a bit shakier, but maybe not since it is
based
on solid results for several major Universities.
Hopefully the MFMP will see a further validation of this M.O. - if
and when
their "dummy" turns out to produce what could be slight gain. That
would be
my expectation.
Thanks for your insight.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Ellefson
Dear Vortex-L,
Stimulated by Jones Beene's thoughts on a coherent lasing system
based on a
Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) from his postings earlier today, I
hope to
encourage further discussion along these lines of thought.
In reference to the characteristic morphology of the nickel ash grain
(particle 1, figure 2, page 43) that I described in this posting:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html
I believe that the abundant 2-micron protrusions in the nickel ash
represent
dipole oscillators which have literally evolved from the initial
nickel fuel
grain clusters during the startup and then operation of reactor.
These
oscillators form a coupled, complex, highly non-linear system that
could be
described as a LENR-driven LASER analog, much like the SPASER systems
that
are emerging in laboratories right now in the nanoscale, except these
structures are micron-scale. One interesting paper which provides a
potential analog is:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0422v3.pdf ("Plasmon-mediated
superradiance near metal nanostructures")
It is my contention that the observed microstructures in the nickel
ash
grain are _directly homologous_ to the Eigen-modes of this coherent
system.
I believe that Ni-Li neutron exchange reactions are being stimulated
by SPP
and phonon interactions on the protruding structures, and are
producing a
form of polychromatic superradiance such as that observed during
reactions
involving Metastable Innershell Molecular States (MIMS, aka
ballotechnics).
I suspect the energy gain comes from the vacuum during the LENR
reaction,
which I currently picture as a high-velocity collision of Li-Ni-Li
that
produces a MIMS reaction which also (hand-waving here) exchanges
neutrons
between lithium and nickel. This emits only intense photon and phonon
energy, some of which couples back into the system to drive further
reactions, while the rest is thermalized in the reactor shell.
If this is true, then only the EMF stimulation is needed to control
the
reactor via SPP pumping once a certain operating temperature
threshold has
been reached by external heating. Rossi could simplify his control by
separating these two functions of heating and EMF stimulation, I
suspect.
This separation may be the primary function of the mouse/cat reactor
configuration, where the mouse emits primarily photons as the cat's
controlling input, once a minimum temperature is reached throughout
the
system.
Using only EMF pumping to control the reaction would also greatly
improve
the COP, which may be part of the reason why the systems that Rossi
demonstrates still have combined heating and RF control inputs.
I suspect that if you were to construct a good approximation of the
nickel
ash grain morphology with natural nickel, combined it with lithium
and large
iron grains, and stimulated it with EMF while at a high enough
temperature,
that you would see this system become active and gainful. A
high-resolution
3-d printer could do this, as could a plethora of extant
micro-fabrication
techniques. Then again, given that Rossi's systems evolve in-situ
from
powdered fuel, why bother with fabricating machines? The main
purpose I can
think of for a designed and manufactured fuel morphology would be to
optimize the potential for electrical output while minimizing thermal
output.
I hope these ideas are able to inspire further insights into this
system.
-Bob Ellefson
