http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroidal_moment
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a two. way full duplex energy transfer path between the SPP > condensate and the nuclear reactions via a magnetic field. Specifically a > anapole field. > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> I made a mistake in the 4th paragraph and have changed the wording to >> "one quanta" rather than "more one". >> >> Bob >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 22, 2014 7:15 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born? >> >> Axil, Robert, Jones etal.-- >> >> How does the mass energy of a nucleus transfer to the plasmons described >> in this article? >> >> It must be the secret sauce of Rossi's reactor. >> >> The mechanism of transferring the energy to the dipoles of the >> nanoplasmonic substance and, hence via super radiance to the lattice of the >> metal, seems correct assuming the nanoplasmonic coherent system or entity >> is pumped up in energy by something. >> >> The paper cited does not address the possible ways of exciting the >> available plasmonic entity Eigen states. It does suggest that Eigen values >> of spin 1 are preferred in the transfer of small quanta of energy to the >> metal lattice and this suggests a mechanism for mass transfer to the >> plasmonic entity. >> >> Potentially, a two way reaction takes place where an excited nucleus >> with its angular momentum Eigen states transfers one quanta of angular >> momentum to the plasmonic state. This would change the odds for the return >> to a lower energy nuclear state of the original nucleus and >> potentially favor a new set of nuclei which conserve the angular momentum >> of the coherent system--nuclei and nanoplasmonic state with a transfer of >> many additional quanta to the plasmonic entity one quanta at a time. >> >> The nanoplasmonic state then proceeds to transfer its excess angular >> momentum energy back to the metal lattice (as suggested in the paper from >> Jackson State and the French University contributors) with the excess mass >> changed to small bits of radiant energy and hence to heat. >> >> Exciting the Eigen states of the original nucleus is nothing more than >> what is done in NMR (MRI) machines and maybe Rossi's reactor. >> >> In keeping with humble conjectures, >> >> Bob Cook >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:55 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A new type of laser is born? >> >> Please...yes, you are all on the right track,,,This is all standard >> nanoplasmonic theory. What is not covered by you good fellows yet and the >> area that I am still ahead on is how the SPP concentrate EMF and project it >> to cause nuclear reactions with the help of particle formation from the >> vacuum.. >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Bob, >>> >>> The Pustovit paper you found certainly supplies the formalism for what we >>> are suggesting, and is almost too perfect. >>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0422v3.pdf >>> "Plasmon-mediated superradiance near metal nanostructures" >>> >>> I am taken aback by a Russian PhD at Jackson State - being the author, >>> but >>> it is what it is. Lots of top-level Russians have come to the US simply >>> to >>> get away from that madness. >>> >>> Of course, this interlocking set of hypotheses we are talking about - is >>> still a house of cards, and to combine so many mechanisms into a model >>> which >>> was ostensibly supposed to be based on nuclear fusion but is now >>> completely >>> different - is going to ruffle a lot of feathers. >>> >>> But clearly there is no nuclear reaction involved in this experiment, >>> and if >>> there can be 1.5 megawatt of heat with counts that are actually less than >>> background - I think we are on the right track to pursue any valid >>> alternative, even if the thermal gain was half the claim; and this hybrid >>> explanation is looking better and better as the papers mount up >>> suggesting >>> that the SPP, superradiance and MIMS details are themselves relevant. The >>> Casimir leg of the table is a bit shakier, but maybe not since it is >>> based >>> on solid results for several major Universities. >>> >>> Hopefully the MFMP will see a further validation of this M.O. - if and >>> when >>> their "dummy" turns out to produce what could be slight gain. That would >>> be >>> my expectation. >>> >>> Thanks for your insight. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Robert Ellefson >>> Dear Vortex-L, >>> >>> Stimulated by Jones Beene's thoughts on a coherent lasing system based >>> on a >>> Dynamical Casimir Effect (DCE) from his postings earlier today, I hope to >>> encourage further discussion along these lines of thought. >>> >>> In reference to the characteristic morphology of the nickel ash grain >>> (particle 1, figure 2, page 43) that I described in this posting: >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html >>> >>> I believe that the abundant 2-micron protrusions in the nickel ash >>> represent >>> dipole oscillators which have literally evolved from the initial nickel >>> fuel >>> grain clusters during the startup and then operation of reactor. These >>> oscillators form a coupled, complex, highly non-linear system that could >>> be >>> described as a LENR-driven LASER analog, much like the SPASER systems >>> that >>> are emerging in laboratories right now in the nanoscale, except these >>> structures are micron-scale. One interesting paper which provides a >>> potential analog is: >>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.0422v3.pdf ("Plasmon-mediated >>> superradiance near metal nanostructures") >>> >>> It is my contention that the observed microstructures in the nickel ash >>> grain are _directly homologous_ to the Eigen-modes of this coherent >>> system. >>> I believe that Ni-Li neutron exchange reactions are being stimulated by >>> SPP >>> and phonon interactions on the protruding structures, and are producing a >>> form of polychromatic superradiance such as that observed during >>> reactions >>> involving Metastable Innershell Molecular States (MIMS, aka >>> ballotechnics). >>> I suspect the energy gain comes from the vacuum during the LENR reaction, >>> which I currently picture as a high-velocity collision of Li-Ni-Li that >>> produces a MIMS reaction which also (hand-waving here) exchanges neutrons >>> between lithium and nickel. This emits only intense photon and phonon >>> energy, some of which couples back into the system to drive further >>> reactions, while the rest is thermalized in the reactor shell. >>> >>> If this is true, then only the EMF stimulation is needed to control the >>> reactor via SPP pumping once a certain operating temperature threshold >>> has >>> been reached by external heating. Rossi could simplify his control by >>> separating these two functions of heating and EMF stimulation, I suspect. >>> This separation may be the primary function of the mouse/cat reactor >>> configuration, where the mouse emits primarily photons as the cat's >>> controlling input, once a minimum temperature is reached throughout the >>> system. >>> >>> Using only EMF pumping to control the reaction would also greatly improve >>> the COP, which may be part of the reason why the systems that Rossi >>> demonstrates still have combined heating and RF control inputs. >>> >>> I suspect that if you were to construct a good approximation of the >>> nickel >>> ash grain morphology with natural nickel, combined it with lithium and >>> large >>> iron grains, and stimulated it with EMF while at a high enough >>> temperature, >>> that you would see this system become active and gainful. A >>> high-resolution >>> 3-d printer could do this, as could a plethora of extant >>> micro-fabrication >>> techniques. Then again, given that Rossi's systems evolve in-situ from >>> powdered fuel, why bother with fabricating machines? The main purpose I >>> can >>> think of for a designed and manufactured fuel morphology would be to >>> optimize the potential for electrical output while minimizing thermal >>> output. >>> >>> I hope these ideas are able to inspire further insights into this system. >>> >>> -Bob Ellefson >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
