Nobody really knows how the E-Cat radiates energy. Ni/H is completely undefined technology. No assumptions should be made about LENR. The IR camera calibration is an excellent opportunity to made bad assumptions about the calibration of these sensors. This is the main reason why I believe that an air flow calorimeter is the best way to determine how much energy that the E-Cat was producing. The argument that this method of energy measurement is too inexact can be overcome by good design of this type of calorimeter. At least this type of calorimeter can be calibrated.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:35 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > The actual measurement that I am interesting in is the amount of power > being radiated and convected away from the device. If the effective > temperature can be manipulated by some process that results in less than > expected power emission, then we are being fooled. That is the root of my > reservations. > > I have little doubt that excess power is being generated internally by the > ECAT core, but an accurate accounting of that power eludes me thus far. > The earlier version of the ECAT with the black painted surface appears to > be subject to less error in these important calculations. It is > unfortunate that the latest version remains so difficult to verify. > > Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: H Veeder <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, Oct 26, 2014 11:55 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP interviews spokesman from WILLIAMSON > > Use both as a cross check. > > harry > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Robert Dorr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> As to whether a spot pyrometer is more accurate than an IR camera, I >> think depends on their use. For small area or pin point measurement I agree >> that a spot pyrometer may be more accurate, but for large or gross >> measurement I think the IR camera would be just as accurate if not more so. >> I think that there is no problem using the IR cameras for accurate >> measurement of the temperature of the Rossi ecat as long as the cameras >> were calibrated properly. >> >> Robert Dorr >> >> >> At 10:16 PM 10/25/2014, you wrote: >> >> Hank Mills transcript : >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WNDVQVEhmUjJ4ek0/view >> >> But it's still not clear whether they should use 8-14u or 2.5u >> >> In any case, their spot pyrometer is most likely more accurate. >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8454 - Release Date: 10/25/14 >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8454 - Release Date: 10/25/14 >> > >
