We cannot even assume that it follows the laws of physics? ***A law is just a mathematically rigorous observation. It is not a dictate from nature. LENR is a field of study precisely because the laws of physics are being "broken". It's as if you took some bricks and dropped them from the leaning tower of Pisa just as Newton did, and instead of falling at 1/2gt^2, sometimes the bricks that are sprinkled with a minute amount of pixie dust drop at 2X the acceleration as normal. The mathematically vigorous observation no longer applies under these weird conditions. It wouldn't be a problem if science actually worked the way science was supposed to, but in this case there are entrenched interests in science that would lose their funding if they accepted that the pixie dust bricks actually did fall at the rate described.
On 10/27/14, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nobody really knows how the E-Cat radiates energy. >> > > It radiates heat energy according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, like any > other object. The source of the heat is irrelevant. All hot objects radiate > heat the same way, and they all turn the same incandescent color at a given > temperature. It makes no difference whether the heat is caused by > combustion, electricity, friction, fission, fusion or zero point energy. > > > >> Ni/H is completely undefined technology. No assumptions should be made >> about LENR. >> > > We cannot even assume that it follows the laws of physics? If we make no > assumptions about it then we cannot believe any calorimetry. > > > >> The IR camera calibration is an excellent opportunity to made bad >> assumptions about the calibration of these sensors. >> > > If the calibration was done correctly there should be no problem. It is not > clear to me whether it was done correctly or not. > > - Jed >
