What is new in LENR is how high power magnetic force interacts with the vacuum, nuclear matter, and associated orbital electrons.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > We cannot even assume that it follows the laws of physics? > ***A law is just a mathematically rigorous observation. It is not a > dictate from nature. LENR is a field of study precisely because the > laws of physics are being "broken". It's as if you took some bricks > and dropped them from the leaning tower of Pisa just as Newton did, > and instead of falling at 1/2gt^2, sometimes the bricks that are > sprinkled with a minute amount of pixie dust drop at 2X the > acceleration as normal. The mathematically vigorous observation no > longer applies under these weird conditions. It wouldn't be a problem > if science actually worked the way science was supposed to, but in > this case there are entrenched interests in science that would lose > their funding if they accepted that the pixie dust bricks actually did > fall at the rate described. > > On 10/27/14, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Nobody really knows how the E-Cat radiates energy. > >> > > > > It radiates heat energy according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, like any > > other object. The source of the heat is irrelevant. All hot objects > radiate > > heat the same way, and they all turn the same incandescent color at a > given > > temperature. It makes no difference whether the heat is caused by > > combustion, electricity, friction, fission, fusion or zero point energy. > > > > > > > >> Ni/H is completely undefined technology. No assumptions should be made > >> about LENR. > >> > > > > We cannot even assume that it follows the laws of physics? If we make no > > assumptions about it then we cannot believe any calorimetry. > > > > > > > >> The IR camera calibration is an excellent opportunity to made bad > >> assumptions about the calibration of these sensors. > >> > > > > If the calibration was done correctly there should be no problem. It is > not > > clear to me whether it was done correctly or not. > > > > - Jed > > > >
