Hi Christoph and Sebastian,

I have tried all the options with no luck. The compressibility of CG is
different than the EX so I tried adding the cg_prefactor. But this hasn't
improved the number of cycles.

When comparing the densities like Sebastian suggested, I found that there
were oscillations so I have increased the spline length. That hasn't helped
either. The spline max right now is equal to the box length.

I have increased ex_force_cap, played around with spline values and
equi_time. Is there anything else I can try?

Thanks a lot!

Anu

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>wrote:

> 2012/11/2  <[email protected]>:
> > Hi Anu,
> >
> > I just have a few things to add:
> >
> > - after the first iteration, check the density profile after spline
> > smoothing in .smooth.dens (compare to the raw density file in
> .dist.new). If
> > there are oscillations, you have to tune the spline parameters.
> > - I am not sure postupd scale applies, but you can as well simply reduce
> the
> > prefactor to see if it is to high ( this may very well be if your CG
> model
> > has a different compressibility)
> Yes, postupd scale works as well, but out of all post update scripts
> scale and smooth are the only useful ones for the ft iteration.
>
> Scaling the prefactor scales the forces (before integration) while
> postupd scale scales the potential (after spline fit and integration),
> so the result could be slightly different, but in principle it does
> the same.
>
> If you add the prefactor from the coarse-grained compressibility in
> cg_prefactor, a linear interpolation between cg_prefactor and the
> prefactor from the explicit compressibility will be used as a
> prefactor in the hybrid zone automatically.
>
> Christoph
>
> > - Increase the total simulation time per iteration step and trash some of
> > the trajectory in the beggining using gromacs.equi_time in the settings
> file
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> >
> > -Sebastian
> >
> > Zitat von Christoph Junghans <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2012/10/31 Anu Nagarajan <[email protected]>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to run the thermodynamic force using csg_inverse. I have
> the
> >>> settings.xml file with appropriate options for my system. But, when I
> try
> >>> to
> >>> run TF, I get about 2-3 iterations after which the temperature gets
> >>> really
> >>> high and the system becomes unstable. I have the latest version (1.2.3)
> >>> of
> >>> votca. I computed the prefactor based on the compressibility of the
> >>> atomistic region.  According to the tutorial and the paper, I have set
> >>> the
> >>> TF range to be d(skin)+d(at)+d(hy)+d(skin) where d(skin) is right now
> >>> half
> >>> the cutoff distance. The entire molecule is one charge group and I have
> >>> 12
> >>> atoms plus virtual site.  Do I have to change any values in the
> >>> settings.xml
> >>> file? Is there anything I might be missing?
> >>
> >> The parameters will depend on the system you study.
> >> Here are some things you could try:
> >> - increase adress_ex_forcecap in the mdp file
> >> - increase the spline grid (spline_start, spline_end in
> >> cg.non-bonded.inverse.tf) in setting.xml
> >> - add a cg_prefactor in  cg.non-bonded.inverse.tf, which is based on
> >> the compressibility of the cg model
> >> - scale the update (add postupd task scale) by something < 1
> >>
> >> Sebastian, please add stuff if I have missed something.
> >>
> >> Christoph
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I appreciate any help in this matter!
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>> Anu
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "votca" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christoph Junghans
> >> Web: http://www.compphys.de
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "votca" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway.
> >> http://www.astaro.com
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "votca" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Christoph Junghans
> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/votca?hl=en.

Reply via email to