On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 18:03:33 -0800 bhtrading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >corrrect me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see the name of the vise that Don is >referrring to- I do know he uses a Norlander rotary vise as do I. The >Norlander has improved my tying & after a getting "used to the damn thing" >period, it works very well. Bill H
Now Bill, I have seen your flies and you're saying that they are improved! :-) Just kidding1 Tim <>< >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Don Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:05 PM >Subject: Re: Fly Vise Help > > >> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > I think a commercial tier would prefer a rotary vise >> of more conventional nature. >> >> This comment might hold true to some, but for me it >> depends on the pattern I happen to be tying. Most >> flies, after having mastered some of the >> idiosynchracies of the system (both the vise and >> bobbin) take me no longer than they used to on my HMH >> or Dyna King. For other patterns like wooly buggers >> and egg-sucking leeches, it has been a BIG time saver. >> For example, the system helped me shave over 7 minutes >> off a fully weighted, size 2 egg-sucking leech. The >> best attributes of the system are the techniques that >> are next to impossible with other vise systems >> (peacock chenille, real-time dubbing brushes, etc.). >> >> ~Don Johnson~ >> >> >> ===== >> http://www.geocities.com/salmn8r/caddisforkids.html >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Send your FREE holiday greetings online! >> http://greetings.yahoo.com >> >> > > Have you gotten your free email at fishing.com or flyfishing.com? I got mine, come get yours! Visit www.fishing.com or www.flyfishing.com to sign up!
