Bill, you are correct, I was referring to the Nor-Vise but got a little carried away chopping the original message for brevity. Sorry if that created any confusion. DJ
--- bhtrading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > corrrect me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see the name > of the vise that Don is > referrring to- I do know he uses a Norlander rotary > vise as do I. The > Norlander has improved my tying & after a getting > "used to the damn thing" > period, it works very well. Bill H > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 9:05 PM > Subject: Re: Fly Vise Help > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I think a commercial tier would prefer a rotary > vise > > of more conventional nature. > > > > This comment might hold true to some, but for me > it > > depends on the pattern I happen to be tying. Most > > flies, after having mastered some of the > > idiosynchracies of the system (both the vise and > > bobbin) take me no longer than they used to on my > HMH > > or Dyna King. For other patterns like wooly > buggers > > and egg-sucking leeches, it has been a BIG time > saver. > > For example, the system helped me shave over 7 > minutes > > off a fully weighted, size 2 egg-sucking leech. > The > > best attributes of the system are the techniques > that > > are next to impossible with other vise systems > > (peacock chenille, real-time dubbing brushes, > etc.). > > > > ~Don Johnson~ > > > > > > ===== > > > http://www.geocities.com/salmn8r/caddisforkids.html > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > > http://greetings.yahoo.com > > > > > ===== http://www.geocities.com/salmn8r/caddisforkids.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com
