|
I am sickened by this excuse where Bush is not guilty by
reason of Clinton did it first. That is, a murderer should walk because
someone else had murdered before him. Murder therefore is OK.
That we could sit about as partisans and watch our resources
burn to the ground is hard for me to fathom. When I say "we", I mean we
flyfishermen.
Is there nothing that the Republicans could do that would not
immediately be justified in one way or another including the shabby excuse that
someone else did it? Does this man, Bush, have a green light from us
to do anything?
Seems like he does even though he won this time by only a
handful of votes.
Bob
|
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first. Bob Lawless
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first. Roger
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first. Wyatt Thaler
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first. ERIC OLSON
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first. Jim Jones
- RE: Dams and well Clinton did it fir... David Weitl
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it... snedeker
- RE: Dams and well Clinton di... Keith Bell
- Re: Dams and well Clinton di... MT Williams
- Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first. Leland Miyawaki
- RE: Dams and well Clinton did it first. Stu Farnham

