I agree. The thing we all need to do is realize that people listen
when speaking respectfully. I don't like Bushes policies and what they
mean. But I also know we don't have much choice for the next 4
years. We either figure out how to get a long so we are heard or get bull
dozed. Apparently there are a whole bunch of people out there who really
like him. We will see if they still love him 4 years from now.
Gets back to the old saying: How do you eat an elephant? ONe
bite at a time.
Dialogue is important and that happens by listening and being
respectful. Butting heads is the fastest way to make sure that we don't
get heard. Now that is something to be concerned about.
Eric
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 12:13
PM
Subject: Re: Dams and well Clinton did it
first.
I don't know this seems fly fishing related to me. The
president wants to
lift/change protections on salmonids in the NW.
How is this NOT flyfishing
related. Just because you don't want to
hear about it does not mean it
isn't relevant.
Thanks for sharing
Bob.
Wyatt Thaler
>From: "Roger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To:
[email protected]
>To:
<[email protected]>
>Subject:
Re: Dams and well Clinton did it first.
>Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:04:29
-0800
>
>I thought we had pretty much decided after the last go
around that our
>opinions of politicians and political party involved
had no place on this
>flyfishing discussion group. I really don't want
to see this start up
>again. We all have our own opinions about
politics. There are other sites
>where we can do this. I suspect that
if we had to divide ourselves up, one
>third would fish the middle of
the river, one third the left bank, and one
>third the right
bank.
>
>I would like to read a few more posts on what we got for
Christmas (used
>the non politically correct term this time) subject
that I started.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Roger, aka
ffishnfly
> ----- Original Message -----
>
From: Bob Lawless
> To: [email protected]
>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:17 AM
> Subject: Dams and
well Clinton did it first.
>
>
> I am sickened
by this excuse where Bush is not guilty by reason of
>Clinton did it
first. That is, a murderer should walk because someone else
>had
murdered before him. Murder therefore is OK.
>
>
That we could sit about as partisans and watch our resources burn to the
>ground is hard for me to fathom. When I say "we", I mean we
flyfishermen.
>
> Is there nothing that the
Republicans could do that would not
>immediately be justified in one
way or another including the shabby excuse
>that someone else did
it? Does this man, Bush, have a green light from us
>to do
anything?
>
> Seems like he does even though he won
this time by only a handful of
>votes.
>
>
Bob
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG
Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 -
Release Date: 1/3/2005
>No virus found in this outgoing
message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus
Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date:
1/3/2005
|
