Andrew Nielsen on 23/12/01 5:53 PM, wrote: > To me, Mac OS X 10.1.2 running on a G4 at 400 MHz, and an iBook (dual > USB) with G3 at 500 MHz, seems fairly snappy now. No doubt there are > many more improvements that will be made in performance, but it's > certainly useable now.
Agreed it is useable, it's my primary platform now and about the only thing I use in classic any more is MYOB but every time I come across something that's slow or not quite right I file it as a bug report... <http://www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/> ... for improvements sake ;-) > If only we had a backup program that worked. That's the main thing > I'm hanging out for now. I'm confused as to why it's so hard to get the backup app's working? What exactly is it that prevents one from just dragging and dropping the contents of one disk onto another? Is it some kind of dependency on pathnames tied to a volume/partition name or what? How do traditional Unix's (Unices?) handle backups? Cheers Troy.
