FOR GOODNESS SAKES ONNO ... FORGET IT !!
On Tuesday, February 5, 2002, at 07:48 AM, Onno Benschop wrote:
The intent of my contribution was to increase the value of the list to
*all* subscribers, current and future. If this offends you, I am sorry.
Running the risk of extending this thread further, I will state the
following:
At 19:19 4/02/02 +0800, Paul S wrote:
Okay here goes, I'm offended by this reactionary email.
The message was not directed at Paul, which is why I quoted him with: "a
subscriber"
At 08:24 4/02/02 +0800, Onno Benschop wrote:
At 23:57 1/02/02 +0800, a subscriber wrote:
You will no doubt have noticed this line in my message:
At 08:24 4/02/02 +0800, Onno Benschop wrote:
How could the original question, one of many mind you, just the one to
bear
the brunt of this response
You'll also have noticed:
At 08:24 4/02/02 +0800, Onno Benschop wrote:
It is *my opinion* that the WAMUG list is slowly but surely
degenerating
To conclude, as a subscriber, never a moderator, I am doing what I
believe
all list subscribers have a responsibility to do, attempt to improve the
quality of the list. You may well argue that it's great. I can tell you
that it has been better. It can get better still and I believe that only
the subscribers can do this.
Creating an electronic community is just as much hard work as creating a
friendship. You have to work at it all the time.
--
()/)/)() ..ASCII for Onno..
|>>? ..EBCDIC for Onno..
--- -. -. --- ..Morse for Onno..
ITmaze - ABN: 56 178 057 063 - ph: 04 1219 8888 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Got a Question? Try searching the WAMUG list archives first at
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wamug/messages/>
To unsubscribe from the WAMUG e-mail list, send e-mail from this
account to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Regards,
Stephen Chape
