Hehe, glad to hear your code is clean Pat ;o)

Well, if the W3C Markup Validation Service gives the html file a clean bill
of health, it does look like the Quicklook shipping in OSX 10.10.2 is the
problem.

Update:
I¹ve just seen your latest email ­ so the combo update didn¹t fix it.


My gut feeling is that it is unlikely to be the particular computer model
and that it still could be a page specific problem ­ but my gut is often
wrong ;o)  - your file passes the W3C Markup Validation Service ­ but maybe
there is some (valid) code that quicklook can¹t handle.

You could always test that by trying your page file on a computer that is
known to display html in Quicklook (maybe email to Peter?)



You could easily check if you have a Quicklook problem on ALL html files by
just writing the most basic html page ­ just valid html framework with, say,
just one line of plain text content ³html test page².

That might just confirm if the problem is with html files in general or just
certain html content.




Again, just a thought.


Good luck



Neil
-- 
Neil R. Houghton
Albany, Western Australia
Tel: +61 8 9841 6063
Email: [email protected]



on 4/2/15 12:10, [email protected] at [email protected] wrote:

> Hi, again, Neil,
> 
> Nothing dirty about my code. With BBEdit hanging over my shoulder with every
> keystroke, there¹s little chance of that. I always verify the code on every
> page just to catch the little oversights.
> 
> Thanks,
> Pat
> 
>> On 4 Feb 2015, at 11:22, Neil Houghton <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Re: OS 10.10.2 and Quicklook
>> Hi Pat,
>> 
>> Yes, I understand your point ­ but, if it had worked, you wouldn¹t have had
>> to CONTINUE to open in a browser first ­ just a one-time thing for each file
>> ­ at least that¹s what I found with the PDFs ­ the first opening of the file
>> with the appropriate software seemed to generate the first ³preview² after
>> that, Quicklook continued to work as it should (ie without having to first
>> open the file).
>> 
>> However, since this approach DIDN¹T work for you, the point is academic ;o)
>> 
>> 
>> Good look with the combo update ­ I guess if it is an OSX problem that could
>> fix it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> One other thought ­ have you checked that your html is all valid ­ modern
>> browsers tend to handle dirty code quite gracefully but maybe the latest OSX
>> Quicklook is less tolerant (this could perhaps explain why some people, like
>> Peter, are finding Quicklook OK with html) ­ again this is a bit of a long
>> shot ;o)
>> 
>> 
>> Whenever I create a webpage, I always run it through the W3C Markup
>> Validation Service at <http://validator.w3.org/check>
>>> This validator checks the markup validity of Web documents in HTML, XHTML,
>>> SMIL, MathML, etc. If you wish to validate specific content such as RSS/Atom
>>> feeds or CSS stylesheets, MobileOK content, or to find broken links, there
>>> are other validators and tools available. As an alternative you can also try
>>> our non-DTD-based validator.
>> 
>> Just select the ³Validate by file upload² tab and you can browse to your html
>> file, select it, and hit the ³check² button.
>> If all your html is valid, it should come back with a ³passed² message ­
>> otherwise it will highlight errors and warnings.
>> 
>> I find this invaluable - it¹s amazing how many little errors sneak through ­
>> and this makes it really easy to cleanup your code & get a pass mark ;o)
>> 
>> Again, just a thought.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Neil

-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
Settings & Unsubscribe - <http://lists.wamug.org.au/listinfo/wamug.org.au-wamug>