----- Original Message -----
From: Al Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: {W&P} SV: Even conservatives smell a rat in the White House
>
>
> Claes Persson wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: rod/christine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 5:17 AM
> > Subject: {W&P} Even conservatives smell a rat in the White House
> >
> >
> > > Even conservatives smell a rat in the White House
> > >
> > >
>http://cgi.newcity.com/exitlog/frameset.php?close=http://www.newmassmedia.com/nac.phtml?code=har&db=nac_fea&ref=21338&back=http://www.newcity.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ====================
> > >
> >
> > The starting to wonder over facts can be expected. There always come
> > more or less founded theories to what really have happend.
> >
> > Something I can not get passed is the fact that the bid airliner that's
> > supposed to have hit Pentagon seems to have been flying without wings
> > and engines. The hole after this aeroplane is far too small for a big
> > airliner to have dissppeared insid compleatelly. Specially as the hole
> > at first was just a hole in the wall. Now...
> >
> > Where are those giant wings and the enormous engines? The aeroplanes
> > wingspan is many times bigger than the hole in the wall. Any one have an
> > answere?
> >
> > Claes
> > §( :8-)
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------
>
> I don't always waste my time reading the links Rod sends becaus they
> tend, all too often, to be wacko conspiratorial stuff or from groups
> that start out with a prejudiced attitude toward government, business
> and/or common sense.
>
> I can tell you that there wre many, many witnesses to the crash of the
> plane into the Pentagon. There were people on that flight who were on
> cell phones to loved ones.
>
> There's no reason to doubt that a specific, known airliner struck the
> Pentagon. It was loaded with specific, known indviduals and was watched
> as it flew into the building by many people who were on the nearby
> streets and roads.
>
> The aircraft hit at ground level, skidding into the building. It was
> already breaking into smaller pieces as it impacted the building.
>
> September 11, 2001 was a day of serious events. It deserves to be
> considered seriously by serious people. We all had a very clear
> television view of what happened in New york that day. We also have
> plenty of information about the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania.
>
> It escapes me why conspiracy buffs would invent fanciful theories that
> divorce the Pentagon attck from the other events of theday. But then,
> I'm not a psychiatrist.
>
I don't know either, but I have not seen anything on any photo that indicates that any
rubble or rests of those big engines or wings is present there. Don't you wonder why?
No disrespect for the victims is intended, beleive me, but still.
___________________________________________________________
Check out http://clik.to/sf for other lists to join.
A93MR48T18
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1dhdK.b1tdRU
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
