Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 02:16 schrieb Giel van Schijndel:
> Dennis Schridde schreef:
> > Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 01:23 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 19:07:05 -0500 Dennis Schridde
> >>
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2007 00:42 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >>>> devurandom wrote in the forums:
> >>>> "It seems as another discussion rises again: Shall I compile with MSVC
> >>>> and force our users to install the MSVC redist or shall I compile with
> >>>> GCC and be not able to use Microsoft Windows Debug Reports... *umpf*"
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't know why you wouldn't want to use the latest stuff from MS.
> >>>>
> >>>> They are the ones that require it for the compiler output, so that
> >>>> isn't your fault.
> >>>
> >>> Who requires it? For compiler output?
> >>
> >> I mean the .exe requires it if compiled with MSVCEE.
> >>
> >>>> It would be like using a older version of physfs/openAL/SDL,
> >>>> instead of the most updated (and bugfixed) codebase/libs/dlls.
> >>>> If someone don't want to update, then that is their problem, not
> >>>> yours, or the other WZ developers.
> >>>> With all the other project/developers using the newest compilers
> >>>> from MS, this should be a moot point.
> >>>
> >>> I think I can say that most (not all) devs are using GCC and most
> >>> of them do
> >>> that on a Linux system. So getting minidumps which are compatible
> >>> with MSVC
> >>> wont help them much if MSVC is needed to view them.
> >>>
> >>> But as WINE can replay minidumps, I don't see a need anymore to
> >>> use MSVC.
> >>>
> >>>> "The Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) installs
> >>>> runtime components of Visual C++ Libraries required to run
> >>>> applications developed with Visual C++ on a computer that does not
> >>>> have Visual C++ 2005 installed." 2.6MB won't kill anyone.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=32BC1BEE-A3F9
> >>>>-4C13-9C99-220B62A191EE&displaylang=en
> >>>
> >>> I know that that package exists...
> >>> But most people don't have it installed, so best would to ship it with
> >>> the installer. But that is not what a modem user likes...
> >>
> >> Modem user?  They be mad change from pcx to png though.
> >> They happy from wave to ogg.  Can't please them. :S
> >>
> >>> And given that WINE also can read the minidump files, I think we don't
> >>> need it. (And actually I dislike the idea to switch over to Windows to
> >>> compile releases. ;) )
> >>
> >> Yes, sorry.  This only applies if you do use MS compiler for release
> >> code. I just saw that comment from you on forums, and thought to reply.
> >> :)
> >
> > No need to be sorry. ;)
> >
> > And I am glad that someone cares and tries to give input.
> >
> > But actually I only used MSVC, because I wasn't able to get GCC to
> > crosscompile at that time. Now that I got that working and I found out
> > that WINE can do some magic, too, I feel like I don't have to switch over
> > to Windows anymore. ;)
> >
> > If M$ would release MSVC for Linux, I would probably use it again, as it
> > is a IMO superior IDE...
>
> I do use windows (need it to run Borland C++ for school which happens to
> be slow when running it in wine), but that's all I use from MS. And
> that's all I want to use from M$, even if they'd release a product for
> GNU/Linux.
>
> PS MSVC is indeed as an IDE superior to GCC, simply because GCC is no
> IDE, just a compiler collection (as the name implies) ;-) .
But actually I don't know an IDE, which utilizes GCC, which is superior to 
MSVC...

Attachment: pgpnDj3icWafW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to