Hi Dave, I'll create a separate thread where I'll try to post regular copy-n- paste jobs. This thread is pretty large already.
Thanks, David On Oct 14, 6:10 pm, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: > I searched, but couldn't find it - is it a wave thread? Unfortunately > not all of us have wave accounts yet... Could someone post an update > of that discussion here? Ideally, I think it would make most sense if > protocol discussions took place here - both for the wider audience and > to ensure it's archived together with other protocol discussions, and > findable from the wider web. > > My interested is in developing a thick client with good offline > capabilities, and am currently looking at xmpp for c-to-s. My aim > would be to maintain similarities to the s-to-s protocol where > appropriate, and diverge where usage will be different. > > Later, I'm interested in maintaining server-side contacts, shared > contacts, and other capabilities. > > I'm in favor of action over purely theoretical discussion - so believe > we should prove any c-to-s proposals asap through iterative > implementation, rather than delaying implementations until agreement > on a 100% complete paper protocol. > > All the best, > Dave > > On Oct 15, 12:34 am, Dale Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There is a new thread for the discussion, created by myself and another guy. > > it has been split into multiple threads and is better organised so this wont > > happen and its more specific discussion > > It's called The new client/server protocol discussion, everyone in this > > group has access just search for it :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
