ah, thanks for the clarifications folks.

This (http://www.process-one.net/en/blogs/article/
processone_wave_server_ejabberd_extension_video/) seems to be a
legitmate emulation of the protobuffers going on though.

I really hope we arnt all expected to learn googles method, but I'm
getting pessimistic now.

On Oct 25, 8:51 pm, Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Devyn Cairns <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yeah, but ew.... VB.NET. I used VB for a long time and hated it. One of the
> > reasons I moved to Ruby... then Linux.
>
> I know the feeling :) Went to Linux in '95 myself ... back to some
> Windows use recently in part because of my "managerial" duties :/
> Still doing all the hard-core stuff on Linux though ...
>
> That said, the interesting parts of gwave-tools are regexps and are
> therefore easily portable to any other language.
>
> --
> Karim Yaghmour
> CEO - Kryptiva inc.
>
> http://twitter.com/KarimYaghmour
> w:www.kryptiva.com| t: 1.888.777.7207
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to