Hi Peter, You're right, that was an oversight, I added the reference to the introduction part, and highlighted the differences as you mentioned.
My current implementation aims to be forward-compatible with both HTML5 and CSS3, which seems to be rather straightforward from the pure object model. It allows for several runs as per the HTML5 spec, and some variations in the positioning as per the CSS3 spec. I'm not currently implementing CSS3 complex ruby, line stacking or ruby overhang. Thanks, Roland On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Peter Kasting <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Roland Steiner > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I am in the process of implementing ruby (text annotations, mainly used in >> East-Asian text), and would welcome if folks could give me feedback on my >> design document, esp. regarding the rendering/layouting: >> >> http://docs.google.com/View?id=dcgd8hk6_0ccsw4td4 > > > Your doc mentions the CSS3 ruby specs, but not the HTML5 specs (e.g. > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-ruby-element ). It > would be good to link to the HTML5 doc, and perhaps note differences between > the specs (I suggest implementing HTML5 in any cases where HTML5 and CSS3 > differ). > > PK >
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
