On Jun 3, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Roland Steiner wrote:
Hi Peter,
You're right, that was an oversight, I added the reference to the
introduction part, and highlighted the differences as you mentioned.
My current implementation aims to be forward-compatible with both
HTML5 and CSS3, which seems to be rather straightforward from the
pure object model. It allows for several runs as per the HTML5 spec,
and some variations in the positioning as per the CSS3 spec. I'm not
currently implementing CSS3 complex ruby, line stacking or ruby
overhang.
It seems like the design could be simplified considerably if we just
say we're not going to do complex ruby. Given that it's not in HTML5
and that IE doesn't do it, is complex ruby something we even want to
worry about?
dave
(hy...@apple.com)
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
