On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Brent Fulgham <bfulg...@apple.com> wrote:

> So are you proposing to use the system allocator on Windows? Or would we keep 
> using the existing FastMalloc implementation?
> 
> The current malloc logic has been the source of a number of mysterious 
> crashes on Windows, so reverting to the system allocator might be a good 
> thing for stability. I don’t know what the potential performance 
> ramifications would be.

They would be bad. The default malloc on Windows is very slow.

 - Maciej

> 
> -Brent
> 
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Geoffrey Garen <gga...@apple.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Apple's Windows port uses FastMalloc and the last measurements we took show 
>>> it to be a large performance gain over the default Windows malloc 
>>> implementation.
>> 
>> I believe those measurements were taken 5 Windows versions ago.
>> 
>>> While this port is only used by iTunes these days, we still would not want 
>>> to regress its performance. Can the new allocator be made to work with 
>>> Windows?
>> 
>> The set of porting tasks is the same set I outlined for GTK.
>> 
>> The Windows port is missing many performance features, including tiled 
>> scrolling, LLInt, parallel garbage collection, DFG, and FTL. Given those 
>> other major missing pieces, I don’t think this piece is worth the porting 
>> time.
>> 
>> Geoff
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to