02.10.2020, 19:46, "Jonathan Bedard" <jbed...@apple.com>:
> Monotonic Commit Identifiers
> Of great interest to Apple’s engineers has been retaining some kind of 
> ordered tag we can use to refer to commits to make defending CI and bisection 
> easier. We’ve developed a scheme for this that assigns commits an ordered 
> identifier per-branch, outlined in 
> https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/commit-identifiers, designed to be used 
> alongside git hashes. These identifiers can be used in our current Subversion 
> repository, and we would like to start using them before the project has 
> transitions to git.

AFAIU, this is very close to what `git describe` does: you give it git hash, it 
gives you new identifier consisting of 3 parts:

<closest git tag>-<number of commits since that tag>-<abbreviated commit hash>

Note that resulting identifier can be used in all git operations which require 
git reference (like `git log` or `git show`).
So, if you push git tags to main repository (maybe lightweight tags, if you are 
planning to have lots of them), there is no need to invent any other 
identifiers.

As for bisection, git bisect works just fine when given two commit hashes.


-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Reply via email to