Le 2010-11-12 à 13:58, David LeBer a écrit : > > On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > >> On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote: >>> >>> I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to >>> use WO. >> >> The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it? > > > Does Apple really care? Yes I know that clause is in the license. But does > anyone really think that Apple would expend the effort to come after someone > who decided to develop WO on a generic linux box instead of a Mac? > > My sense is that we are so far outside their worldview that we don't even > rate the effort. > > And as preemptive 'yes I understand that' statement: I do understand that the > fact that the clause is there is all it takes as a deterrent for some, and I > am not passing judgement.
I agree that Apple might not care at all, but I think the problem is more with lawyers working at your organization that may say "you can't use this! Apple will go after us! ". -- Pascal Robert [email protected] AIM/iChat : MacTICanada LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/macti Twitter : pascal_robert _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
