On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > Le 2010-11-11 à 19:12, Chuck Hill a écrit : >> On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: >> >>> I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public. >>> People talks about moving away from WO or even writing WO/EOF replacements. >>> But AFAIK, Wonder shows that we can extend the core frameworks a lot. Sure, >>> extending WO so that EOF become multi-threaded or anything like this would >>> be a huge task, but from my point of view (a non-technical one), we can do >>> a lot on top of WO to "fix" problems. And to me, it make more sense to >>> extend WO than trying to rewrite it... >> >> Was there a question in there? > > The question is more that I don't understand why people wants to rewrite WO > when you can simply extend it. To me, it's just like the Linux people who > keeps rewriting stuff instead of improving it. It's incredible the number of > stuff on FreshMeat that do almost the same thing and that could be done in > one or two applications instead of dozens of them.
I don't know that I want to re-write it, but there are bug fixes and enhancements to EOF that I would like that can't easily be done in Wonder. Chuck -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
