Le 2010-11-12 à 15:05, Chuck Hill a écrit : > On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: >> Le 2010-11-11 à 19:12, Chuck Hill a écrit : >>> On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: >>> >>>> I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public. >>>> People talks about moving away from WO or even writing WO/EOF >>>> replacements. But AFAIK, Wonder shows that we can extend the core >>>> frameworks a lot. Sure, extending WO so that EOF become multi-threaded or >>>> anything like this would be a huge task, but from my point of view (a >>>> non-technical one), we can do a lot on top of WO to "fix" problems. And to >>>> me, it make more sense to extend WO than trying to rewrite it... >>> >>> Was there a question in there? >> >> The question is more that I don't understand why people wants to rewrite WO >> when you can simply extend it. To me, it's just like the Linux people who >> keeps rewriting stuff instead of improving it. It's incredible the number of >> stuff on FreshMeat that do almost the same thing and that could be done in >> one or two applications instead of dozens of them. > > > I don't know that I want to re-write it, but there are bug fixes and > enhancements to EOF that I would like that can't easily be done in Wonder.
That's because you don't have time for bug fixes now that you tweet : http://twitter.com/chillgvc/status/3174522576445440 _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
