On Nov 11, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> I have a question that I kept to myself for months, but let's go public. > People talks about moving away from WO or even writing WO/EOF replacements. > But AFAIK, Wonder shows that we can extend the core frameworks a lot. Sure, > extending WO so that EOF become multi-threaded or anything like this would be > a huge task, but from my point of view (a non-technical one), we can do a lot > on top of WO to "fix" problems. And to me, it make more sense to extend WO > than trying to rewrite it... Was there a question in there? -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
