On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote: >> >> I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to >> use WO. > > The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it?
Does Apple really care? Yes I know that clause is in the license. But does anyone really think that Apple would expend the effort to come after someone who decided to develop WO on a generic linux box instead of a Mac? My sense is that we are so far outside their worldview that we don't even rate the effort. And as preemptive 'yes I understand that' statement: I do understand that the fact that the clause is there is all it takes as a deterrent for some, and I am not passing judgement. ;david -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld -- Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: http://tacow.org _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
