> 2. As I mentioned before, you also assume WO will be used only > for Internet use, where the cost of communications lines are high. > Our apps are for intranet use where bandwidth is practically free. Could you explain how the cost of communications (as opposed to the number of concurrent users) have an effect on the cost of deployment for WO? I would imagine just about any Internet environment provides you with a potential audience orders of magnitude higher than an intranet one. Are you saying that because users can download the pages faster this dramaticaly and actually increases the tpm at the WO end? **** Ziya
- RE: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Pierce T. Wetter III
- RE: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Afshin Behnia
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Christian van der leeden
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple mmalcolm crawford
- RE: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Afshin Behnia
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Beverly Voth
- RE: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Pierce T. Wetter III
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple mmalcolm crawford
- RE: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Afshin Behnia
- RE: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Afshin Behnia
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Ziya Oz
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Ronald C.F. Antony
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Ronald C.F. Antony
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple Christian Voelker
- Re: Unfair WO4 pricing - the attitude of apple mmalcolm crawford
