On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Angelo Gladding <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Branko Vukelic <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Although I will probably inevitably end up sounding like a fascist, I >>> don't think a public vote should be the principal decision-making >>> mechanism in projects like this. It's better that everyone simply >>> takes a look at the work-in-progress stuff and contribute their ideas. >> >> It's hard to be cordial when my suggestions of essentially keeping >> nothing and changing everything are being sent to an entrenched artist >> who is commandeering the project under a blurry portrayal of having >> been greenlighted by you. But I tried! I wrapped up my proposal and >> itemized the changes /that could obviously be made under any design >> scheme/. > > Then why do you keep saying things like we are pitted one against the > other (when it was obvious from the beginning that was not the case).
You never acknowledged that I too had work-in-progress. Everything said so far has been predicated on the notion that you and Justin are the de-facto leaders in this endeavor. This point was driven home when you lashed out at me for formally introducing my proposal. -- Angelo Gladding [email protected] http://angelo.gladding.name/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
