Sean Sprague wrote:

> All right. I did not want to open a can of worms in such a fashion; and 
> I certainly did not wish in any way to impune the efforts and successes 
> by yourself and Derek and others. If I did so; then I humbly offer my 
> sincerest apologies to you both (and anyone similarly affected). Saying 
> that the page "sucks" was indeed out of order; and reprehensible to 
> state as such on my behalf. I (as the Community does) value you 
> both(/all) very highly in terms of ability/integrity and without 
> question commitment.

Thank you.

> However, Bill summed it up really by saying (paraphrased WRT OpenSolaris 
> Developer Preview) "Please give it a shot but please don't assume it 
> represents the future of openSolaris". Indiana represents one single 
> potential future of OpenSolaris - _the_ only future of OpenSolaris is 
> surely how the codebase evolves, how the Opensolaris Community 
> grows/evolves, and how distros evolve from the seed that has been planted.

Ok. Fair enough. I'll read it that way. Thanks for the clarification 
(and Bill, too).

> If I have caused offence, to reiterate, I apologize unreservedly.

Thank you.

Jim
-- 
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to