Sean Sprague wrote:
> Jim, with the greatest of respect that I have for you and all the work 
> that you have put into OpenSolaris,
>> Agreed. I would also like to know. I think that splurging the words 
>> "Developer Preview" over "OpenSolaris" is a mistake. is rightly 
>> explained as a milestone in the use of OpenSolaris, but by no means 
>> the be-all-and-end-all of OpenSolaris; and the crude roadmap is 
>> nothing but... crude and non-representational for where OpenSolaris 
>> (as opposed to Indiana) is going.
>>> Basically IMO, the front page currently sucks.
>>
>> It's a great page. The best by far for OpenSolaris, no question about 
>> it. Your comment is offensive, Sean.
> 
> All right. I did not want to open a can of worms in such a fashion; and 
> I certainly did not wish in any way to impune the efforts and successes 
> by yourself and Derek and others. If I did so; then I humbly offer my 
> sincerest apologies to you both (and anyone similarly affected). Saying 
> that the page "sucks" was indeed out of order; and reprehensible to 
> state as such on my behalf. I (as the Community does) value you 
> both(/all) very highly in terms of ability/integrity and without 
> question commitment.
> 
> However, Bill summed it up really by saying (paraphrased WRT OpenSolaris 
> Developer Preview) "Please give it a shot but please don't assume it 
> represents the future of openSolaris". Indiana represents one single 
> potential future of OpenSolaris - _the_ only future of OpenSolaris is 
> surely how the codebase evolves, how the Opensolaris Community 
> grows/evolves, and how distros evolve from the seed that has been planted.
> 
> If I have caused offence, to reiterate, I apologize unreservedly.

Thanks for the clarification, I realize this is a sensitive issue.

As I mentioned before, naming aside, this is a important milestone and 
we need to provide people with easy access to information. I suspect 
when the naming issue gets worked out there will be significantly less 
objection to the content on the home page.

In addition, I think (even more so, after this) that we'll wind up 
moving the distro pages to a separate mini-site at os.org and revert 
os.org/os back to a 'developer' home page as opposed to a click-and-get 
page.

Derek

> 
> Regards. Sean.
> _______________________________________________
> website-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> 


-- 
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to