Sean Sprague wrote:
> Derek,
> 
>> Comments welcome.
>>   
> 
> Just some random (minor) thoughts on aesthetics late at night:
> 
> a) The vertical divider bar appears too far to the right, and extends 
> down too far

I can move it to the middle, but I was trying to make it a 
primary/secondary type arrangement. I will try a few other tweaks and 
see of it looks.


> b) The fact that opensolaris.org has no graphic looks strange

Not sure what to do about that. I need to include the .com logo and we 
don't have one for .org.

> c) Go to OpenSolaris.org should have a graphic bullet, and maybe all the 
> bullets for opensolaris.org should be hyperlinks as per their text.

So add back the underline?

> d) The Opensolaris 2008.05 - x86 could be down a shade from the 
> underline above

OK

> e) The line spacing between the above and System Requirements and Single 
> CD lines could be shaved a little

OK

> f) The tick marks on opensolaris.com do not line up vertically

I don't understand this one.

> g) The Download Now - Free (and its subordinate) and System Requirements 
> lines could be brought back to the vertical level of the Single CD line

OK

> 
> All in all, I just feel that the amount and type of information that is 
> trying to be conveyed by the two halves is not comparable, and that, 
> together with the differing appearances of the two halves makes the page 
> look disjoint.

When you say not comparable do you mean that the .org side is just links 
and the other side has more specific info?

> If I am missing some underlying significant point, then sincere apols; 
> and please ignore the above (nits).

No worries. Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> Regards... Sean.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division

_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to