Hey Derek, hope that you are well.

Some clarification, hopefully...

>> b) The fact that opensolaris.org has no graphic looks strange
>
> Not sure what to do about that. I need to include the .com logo and we 
> don't have one for .org.

A problem indeed... Maybe a quick call to Mrs. Rockwood? ;-) Something 
(probably very nice and Mo"bius) better than nothing?

> c) Go to OpenSolaris.org should have a graphic bullet, and maybe all 
> the bullets for opensolaris.org should be hyperlinks as per their text.
>
> So add back the underline?

No (definitely no underline - very cheesy); what I meant was that the 
final Go to OpenSolaris.org has no graphic at all to its left. Maybe 
just an arrow sigil or suchlike in the same style could be inserted...

> f) The tick marks on opensolaris.com do not line up vertically
>
> I don't understand this one.

If you look carefully at the vertical alignment of the tick marks and 
their associated textual content, they do not all align exactly 
vertically - their is a very minor "jaggedness".

>> All in all, I just feel that the amount and type of information that 
>> is trying to be conveyed by the two halves is not comparable, and 
>> that, together with the differing appearances of the two halves makes 
>> the page look disjoint.
>
>
> When you say not comparable do you mean that the .org side is just 
> links and the other side has more specific info?

Yup. Again a tough one to fix in a short timeframe; but I suspect doable 
(if you have nothing else in your diary at the moment ;-) )

Regards... Sean.

_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to