Charles,
> > Logically, I haven't seen any discussion at the mail list that can lead to
> > this conclusion.
>
> Oh there were discussions on several mailing lists about that.
>
And so were the discussions about the official status of the "Drupal" site as a
long-term solution.
Also, we identified the 23 roles right here, and also discussed the next steps
to be taken for them.
> > It should be circulated well in advance in the agenda and discussed
> > in the mail beforehand, right?
>
> The agenda was posted well beforehand, and it was discussed over and
> over again: WE WORK ON SILVERSTRIPE. WE DON'T WORK ON DRUPAL
> What part of that don't you understand?
Look, I posted two specific posts to understand SC's position on Drupal site.
And I can mention now that it was a difficult task to get a simple "yes" or
"no" answer.
Only after getting satisfied did I volunteer.
Then I volunteered to collect the stakeholders requirements.
The 23 roles were identified on this very mail list.
I do not understand how a position on the Drupal site can be reversed without a
reason.
As mentioned above, work was being planned, apparently with SC's blessings.
We did see a difficulty ahead in getting the stakeholder's responses.
But we always thought we are helping SC by striving even harder.
> > As I mentioned in other mail, irrespective of the CMS used, the
> > central idea was to create a second website that meets the strategic
> > needs of the LibO ecosystem (in particular, the 23 roles). That
> > second site is named "Drupal" just for convenience.
>
> >
> > So when did the SC reverse its decision on this?
> > What's the new approach to achieve the same (or better) outcome?
>
> Sorry? 23 roles about what? Who the hell are you anyway? What's this
> idea to create a "second website that meets the strategic needs of the
> LibO ecosystem"? We don't even know about that!
Then why don't you read the mails posted right here??
Others from the SC did know about this, and didn't object then.
Granted that in any community an apex body has to take the calls, and we have
to honor them.
But surely it cannot be so haphazard?
Anyhow, it would be pointless to discuss this any more, I guess.
Regards,
Narayan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
