On 2011-01-18 7:13 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote: > I think that the main fault of everyone in this specific domain of the > web site (including SC members) was to overlook the web site problem and > leave it unmanaged.
I agree, although I would say *especially* the SC members... this is a *management* problem, and I certainly hope they recognize and own it, and take steps to *fix* it. The first thing I would like to see is an *apology* to Michael and the others for allowing them to *waste so much of their time* on a project the SC was never going to endorse in the first place. Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall anything even approaching such a thing. And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance, Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time. Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon as they saw what was happening. Again - I am dismayed at how this all transpired, and hope the SC and the rest of the LibO *leaders* can learn from this huge (imo) mistake. -- Best regards, Charles -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
