On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 11:20 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 2011-01-18 7:13 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote: > > I think that the main fault of everyone in this specific domain of the > > web site (including SC members) was to overlook the web site problem and > > leave it unmanaged. > > I agree, although I would say *especially* the SC members... this is a > *management* problem, and I certainly hope they recognize and own it, > and take steps to *fix* it. > > The first thing I would like to see is an *apology* to Michael and the > others for allowing them to *waste so much of their time* on a project > the SC was never going to endorse in the first place. Maybe I missed it, > but I don't recall anything even approaching such a thing. > > And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance, > Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long time. > Someone from the SC should have taken him aside as soon as they saw what > was happening. > > Again - I am dismayed at how this all transpired, and hope the SC and > the rest of the LibO *leaders* can learn from this huge (imo) mistake. >
+1 to every word -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
