On 2011-01-18 1:40 PM, Stefan Weigel wrote: > Am 18.01.2011 17:20, schrieb Charles Marcus: >> And no, they - meaning the SC - absolutely cannot claim ignorance, >> Michael was discussing their progress on the lists for a long >> time.
> Maybe not members of the SC, but there are people that have been > answering on the mailing lists from the very beginning and further > on, that it would be wrong to beleive that there was any concrete > decision pro Drupal. It´s not correct to expect an apology for the > waste of time from anyone, if the people working on a Drupal solution > did not want to recognize this information. You are missing the point... If no one *from the SC* contacted Michael *directly* and took the time to explain the situation to him, then *the SC dropped the ball*. If no one *from the SC* *knew* that Michael was putting so much effort into the Drupal site (because they weren't monitoring the brand new official channels of communication), then *the SC dropped the ball*. Periods. If I was a developer, and *thought* I had the blessing of the SC on a project, I wouldn't put much stock in $random_list_member either... Obviously Michael could have been more proactive himself in confirming the situation, but I've never suggested that only the SC made mistakes here. Again, it just seems to me that you (if you are an SC member) are bending over backwards to *avoid* accountability... not a good sign for the future, I'm sorry to say. Regardless, this topic stopped going anywhere a long time ago, and enough has been said, so I'm done. -- Best regards, Charles -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
